Blog

Pacemakers… In a RUSH

Goal of This Blog

Pacemakers are becoming increasingly common as our population ages, and are seen more and more in the emergency department. The goal of this post is to summarize common pacemaker settings, the 5-letter nomenclature of pacemakers, indications for pacemaker placement, pacemaker components, common pacemaker complications (majority of blog), and lastly the management of pacemakers in the ED (including applying a magnet).  …And as always, the blog ends with some medical history

Background

  • Modern pacemakers essentially have two functions:  1) To sense and 2) To pace.
  • Sensing:  pacemakers can either sense the atria or ventricle (or both) for intrinsic cardiac function.
  • Pacing:  If the pacemaker does not sense an adequate atrial or ventricular depolarization for a selected time interval, then the pacemaker will “fire”, thus, providing the needed electrical stimulus to cause cardiac depolarization
    • If the pacemaker does sense an adequate atrial or ventricular depolarization, then it will allow the intrinsic heart to function without interruption (in short, the pacemaker will inhibit itself)

Common Pacemaker Settings and Default Settings

Pacemakers can come in a variety of types and settings (think of all the 3 letter combinations you could make below). Luckily, however, most modern pacemakers come in two main settings (VVI and DDD)
VVI
  • VVI implies that the ventricle is being paced and sensed. Furthermore, the pacemaker will inhibit itself in response to intrinsic ventricular depolarization
  • VVI is more commonly used in elderly/inactive patients
  • A CXR that shows only a single lead in the right ventricle often implies VVI mode. (However, it can also be seen in multiple lead pacemakers as well)
  • If the pacemaker is firing, the EKG will show a pacer spike prior to the QRS complex which will result in the appearance of a LBBB (formation of RBBB signifies lead displacement)
  • It is also possible to see the appearance of “fusion beats” which occur when intrinsic ventricular depolarization begins at the same time as the pacemaker discharge. This is often seen in intermittent heart block, when the pacemaker is intermittently firing.
    Fusion Beats
    Each beat is preceded by a pacer spike. The complexes marked “P” have normal paced LBBB morphology. The complexes marked “F” have varying QRS morphology as the intrinsic and paced ventricular depolarization occur together

DDD

  • I think this description of DDD from Canadiem.org explains it the best: “[DDD] is the wonderkid of pacemakers. It can pace and sense both the atria and ventricle. So if you have a normal P and QRS it just sits back and relaxes. If your P is normal but your QRS is lazy it will kick in to pace the ventricle. If your P is slow but always followed by a normal QRS it will pace the atria but not the ventricle. Finally, if both the atria and ventricle are slow it will pace them both consecutively.”
  • CXR will show an atrial lead and a ventricular lead
  • The EKG may have a variable appearance depending on the intrinsic underlying cardiac function as noted above. For instance:
    • The EKG can appear “normal”—atria and ventricles are depolarizing on their own
    • There can be an atrial pacer spike with a normal narrow QRS that follows as seen in sick sinus syndrome (implies abnormal SA node with intact AV circuitry)
      DDD pacing in sick sinus syndrome
      Atrial Pacer Spike Followed By Normal Narrow Intrinsic QRS Complex
    • There can be normal intrinsic P Waves with a paced wide QRS as seen in complete heart block (implies normal SA node but abnormal AV circuitry)
      Intrinsic P wave followed by paced QRS wave
      Normal Intrinsic P Wave Followed By Paced QRS Complex
    • Or there can be dual pacing of the atria and ventricle with corresponding pacer spikes to each
      Atrial and Ventricle Pacer Spikes
      Atria and Ventricle Pacer Spikes
    • Also of note, the above issues can be intermittent so an EKG can show complexes with intrinsic function as well as paced complexes
      Intermittent DDD Pacing
      1st Circle: Atrial paced – 2nd Circle: normal P and QRS – 3rd Circle: both atrial and ventricle Paced – 4th Circle: normal intrinsic P with paced QRS

VOO/DOO

  • The vast major of pacemakers are set to VVI or DDD. If a magnet is applied, it will revert the pacemaker to its default settings. VVI typically becomes VOO, while DDD becomes DOO.
  • These are called Fixed-Rate Settings
  • VOO:  results in a paced ventricular depolarization at a constant rate (often near 70 bpm) regardless of the patient’s own heart rate or rhythm. Therefore, it will compete with the intrinsic function of the heart. Due to this, fusion beats are not uncommon. Also, if pacer spikes occur during the refractory period, then it will not produce a QRS
    • There is a small risk that the pacer spike can fall during the “Vulnerable period” resulting in Ventricular Fibrillation
  • DOO:  same concept as VOO except it will pace an atrial as well as ventricular beat. Again it does so at a fixed-rate despite the patient’s own heart rate or rhythm.

Overview of 5 Letter Code System

Although the above settings are the most common, it is still important to have a basic understanding of the 5 letter code system so that we are prepared for any situation.
  • Letter 1:  chamber paced:  (A)—atria, (V)—ventricle, or (D)—both chambers
  • Letter 2:  chamber sensed:  (A)—atria, (V)—ventricle, or (D)—both chambers
  • Letter 3:  response to pacemaker sensing: (I)—inhibited, (D)—both chambers inhibited. (T)—triggered (however, no longer seen in modern pacemakers)
  • Letter 4:  refers to rate modulation. This indicates method pacemaker uses to modulate rate in response to physiologic demand (e.g. increasing heart rate during exercise, etc.)
  • Letter 5 (added in 2002):  indicates the presence of multi-site pacing in each chamber
Settings for Pacemaker
Source: RebelEM

Pacemaker EKG

  • The pacing spikes may be difficult to see in all leads. There are many reasons for this, but the type of pacemaker greatly affects this
    • Epicardially placed leads result in smaller pacing spikes than endocardially placed leads
    • Bipolar leads produce smaller pacer spikes than unipolar pacer spikes
  • Intrinsic QRS complexes are typically narrow while paced QRS complexes are wide with LBBB morphology.

Pacemaker Indications

  • Sinus node dysfunction (most common cause)
  • 3rd degree or advanced 2nd degree (Mobitz type II) AV Block
  • Symptomatic bradycardia
  • Atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response

Components of the Pacemaker 

  • Pulse Generator (lithium battery)
  • Electronic circuitry
  • Leads
    • Number of Leads
      • Single lead–endocardial lead positioned in contact with right ventricle
      • Dual Lead–endocardial lead positioned in contact with right atrium and right ventricle
    • Type of Lead
      • Unipolar Configuration:  not compatible with ICD systems and is prone to oversensing of depolarization. Since is of small diameter, less prone to fractures. Consists of negative electrode within the heart and positive electrode within the pulse generator. Due to the distance between the two electrodes, unipolar leads are relatively more prone to oversensing as “outside electrical impulses” can be mistaken for cardiac electrical impulses
        • Pacer spikes are larger  (>20 mm in amplitude on EKG) due to distance between electrodes
      • Bipolar Configuration:  compatible with ICD systems but are larger and relatively more prone to lead fractures. Oversensing is rarely a problem (as the electrodes are closer together so that outside potentials do not get confused as depolarizations). Consists of positive (proximal) electrodes separated by 1 cm negative (distal) electrode both located within the heart.
        • Pacer spikes are smaller (<5 mm amplitude on EKG)

Common Pacemaker Complications

Background of Pacemaker Complications

—  The vast majority of pacemaker complications occur soon after its placement, often within weeks to months. Most often these issues are discovered on routine postoperative pacemaker interrogations.
—  Furthermore, the symptoms that suggest pacemaker malfunctions are often similar to the symptoms that prompted the placement of the pacemaker in the first place (e.g. syncope, pre-syncope, orthostatic hypotension, lightheadedness, dyspnea, or palpitations)
—  There are several ways to divide pacemaker problems, and they differ within resources. Below is a combination of a few of the methods, and I think it helps organize the differential. They are discussed in more detail in a corresponding order as below

1. Pacemaker Box Complications
2. Rate is Too Fast
3. Rate is Too Slow
4. Uncommon problems (But Fun to Talk About)
5. STEMI in paced rhythms
 

1. Pacemaker Box Complications

These are issues that occur relatively soon after placement of a pacemaker including infection, hematoma, thrombophlebitis, and pacemaker syndrome
Infection
  • Pocket Infection (2%)
  • Bacteremia (1%)
    • 20-25% of pts have positive blood cultures. Staph aureus and Staph epidermidis are identified in ~60-70% of cases
  • Endocarditis as a complication of the above should also be considered as infections like to spread contiguously
  • Tx:
    • Vancomycin until culture results
    • Often requires replacement of pacemaker system after appropriate control of infection via antibiotics
Hematoma 
  • May mimic presentation of wound or pocket infection
  • Tx:  Needle aspiration of the pocket. This should be done under fluoroscopy by cardiothoracic team to minimize risk of damaging the pulse generator
Thrombophlebitis
  • Presents as pain, swelling, venous engorgement of the ipsilateral arm (most commonly left). Pain in the ipsilateral arm should prompt the consideration of thrombophlebitis. The incidence of venous obstruction seen on imaging ranges from 30-50%. However, due to the creation of collateral vessels, only ~0.5-3.5% of pts develop above symptoms
  • Tx:  anticoagulation

Pacemaker Syndrome

  • This occurs from the loss of AV synchrony and the presence of ventriculoatrial conduction. This is most commonly seen in VVI pacing with intact sinus node function, which results in the atria contracting against a closed tricuspid and mitral valve. This “contractile asynchrony” results in backloading of atrial contents and loss of atrial “kick”
  • This results in symptoms similar to CHF:  syncope/presyncope, orthostatic hypotension, exercise intolerance, generalized weakness, palpitations, chest fullness, uncomfortable pulsations in the neck or abdomen, cough, RUQ pain (hepatic congestion).
  • Pt may present shortly after pacemaker placement complaining that initial symptoms that prompted pacemaker are now worse
  • Of note, this is a diagnosis of exclusion. Full work-up including pacemaker interrogation should be performed prior to making this diagnosis.
  • Tx:  ~20% of pts reports symptoms suggestive of pacemaker syndrome. In most instances, symptoms are mild and patients adapt to them. However, 6% of patients may experience severe symptoms. If symptoms are severe, pacemaker settings can be adjusted. If necessary, pacemaker can be replaced with a dual chamber pacemaker which creates better atria and ventricular synchrony as supplies both P and QRS depolarizations.

 2.  Is the Rate Too Fast

Tachycardia in the setting of a pacemaker can be normal physiology vs. atrial arrhythmias. However, it can also be from a “malfunctioning pacemaker,” which should be of consideration. Of note, this tachycardia will not exceed the upper heart rate limit set in the pacemaker settings.

Normal Response to Intrinsic Fast Heart Rate
  • The pacemaker should adapt to physiologic needs, therefore, normal causes of tachycardia (infection, hypovolemia, PE) should be considered.
Atrial Arrhythmias 
  • Atrial Flutter, Afib with RVR, SVT can cause tachycardia as the P waves will be sensed by the pacemaker leading to tachycardia

Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia (PMT)

  • This is a type of reentry tachycardia—ventricular depolarization (e.g. PVCs) conducts retrograde into the atria leading the atrial lead to detect activity as incoming P wave resulting in ventricular depolarization (“vicious cycle” develops). Note, that since the pacemaker has a set upper rate limit, the heart rate will not exceed this upper limit.
  • Tx:  block AV to stop reentry tachycardia (adenosine, BB, CCB). Can always apply magnet if unstable. Vagal maneuvers
    • It can also spontaneously self resolve
    • Most modern pacemakers have a feature that will help recognize this issue and self-terminate the loop. It is called the “PMT Function”–it works by prolonging the refractory interval between V and A
      Pacemaker-Mediated-Tachycardia-LITFL-765x436
      Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia

Sensor-Induced Tachycardia

  • Pacemaker is designed to respond to physiologic stress by increasing heart rate (i.e. during exercise, hypercapnia, tachypnea)
  • The pacemaker can react to stimuli not intended to increase heart rate (vibrations, electrocautery during surgery, intense muscle contractions) causing pacemaker to fire at higher rates. Again, this should not exceed the upper heart rate limit set by the pacemaker.
  • Tx:  apply a magnet or decrease upper limit of pacemaker

3.  Is the Rate Too Slow (aka Output Failure)

The pacemaker was placed to prevent bradycardia. If bradycardia is present, then this indicates the pacemaker is not functioning appropriately. This is commonly caused by failure to capture or failure to pace.
Failure to Capture Overview

Failure to capture can be divided into two broad categories. The first category is that the pacemaker is malfunctioning completely, and therefore, there will be no pacer spikes present at all. The second category is that the interface between the lead electrode and the endocardium has changed. This produces an EKG where the pacer spikes are present, however, they are not reaching the needed threshold to result in P or QRS depolarization.

Failure to Capture (Complete Malfunctioning with No Pacer Spikes)
  • No pacer spikes often implies a hardware problem (lead disconnection from pulse generator, lead fracture, battery depletion, or a severely displaced lead)
  • Of note, lead fractures are relatively uncommon nowadays due to the durability of the lead coating. If it does occur, it is often at predictable locations (e.g. site of attachment to pulse generator or at abrupt angulations).
  • Severe lead displacement can also result in lack of pacer spikes. It is discussed below as the lead is more commonly displaced only a few millimeters resulting in failure to capture. It can also result in intermittent capture and pacing if it is “floating” in the pulmonary vasculature as discussed below.
Failure to Capture (Pacer Spikes Present But No Resultant P/QRS depolarizations)
  • Exit Block
    • Exit Block typically results in presence of pacer spikes but no resultant P or QRS depolarization. This is caused from injury or process that affects the endocardium at site of pacer electrode.
    • Most often this is from an MI that causes injury at this electrode site causing scarring that prohibits conduction of the pacer spike
    • It can also be caused by systemic electrolyte abnormalities (e.g. hyperkalemia) that suppress endocardium reaction to the pacer spike
    • Rarely, it can be caused by drugs that suppress cardiac activity (e.g. Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs such as amiodarone)
  • Displaced Lead
    • This is the most common cause of failure to capture. It most often occurs within the first month of pacemaker insertion.
    • Micro-dislodgment:  describes small displacement of the lead that is too small to be seen on CXR. However, the small displacement reduces the lead’s contact with the endocardium resulting in an increased threshold for capture (results in presence of pacer spikes but no resultant P/QRS waves).
    • Macro-Dislogment:  describes larger displacement that can be seen on CXR. This can result in two possibilities
      • Most commonly this results in catheter tip “floating” in pulmonary outflow tract, which allows for intermittent contact with the endocardium. Therefore, will see the presence of intermittent paced complexes as well as loss of some pacer spikes. This leads to a dynamic and changing QRS morphology on EKG
      • If very severe dislodgment, then will see complete lack of pacer spikes as discussed above.
Failure to Pace

This occurs from inappropriate sensing (oversensing or undersensing).
Remember that oversensing=less pacing spikes. Undersensing=more pacing spikes

  • Undersensing
    • Undersensing occurs when the pacemaker fails to detect spontaneous intrinsic depolarizations. This results in asynchronous pacing. Atrial or ventricular pacing spikes arise regardless of P waves or QRS complex

      Undersensing
      Pacer spikes occur at fixed rate as pacemaker is not appropriately sensing P and QRS waves.
    • As you can see, the pacemaker is not appropriately sensing the underlying rhythm, therefore, it is firing in attempt to pace the strip. However, since the pacer spikes are occurring during refractory period, it is not resulting in a paced complex
      • Pacer spikes within QRS and T waves are indicative of undersensing
    • Undersensing can be complete or intermittent so it is possible to see some paced complexes depending on when the pacer spike appears in the EKG rhythm
    • Undersensing can result from a change in pacemaker settings (e.g. the sensitivity threshold is increased so that a larger amplitude is needed to result in sensing by the pacemaker)
    • More commonly it results from right ventricular infarction or progressive fibrosis that accompanies several of the cardiomyopathies—these changes in the endocardium result in a decrease in the intracardiac amplitude which may not be sensed by the pacemaker
      • Note that we also discussed these as causes of failure to capture. Damage to the endocardium can cause both a sensing and capturing issue, and it is possible for these to occur concurrently.
  •  Oversensing
    • These are events that cause the pacemaker to think the heart has intrinsic depolarizations when it really does not. Therefore, the pacemaker does not fire when it should.
    • This is rare. It is caused by the pacemaker detecting “electrical activity” that is non-cardiac in origin. This may lead to intermittent/irregular pacing or a complete absence of pacemaker function
    • Myopotentials from the pectoralis major can cause this.
    • More common in unipolar lead system
    • Can also be caused by Large T waves that are confused for QRS complexes

4.  Uncommon Problems But Fun to Talk About

Runaway Pacemaker
  • More of a historical footnote that occurred in older generation pacemakers resulting from low battery voltage
  • Pacemaker delivers runs of pacing spikes in excess of 2000 bpm. On EKG, it looks similar to VFib
runaway pacemaker
Runaway Pacemaker
Twiddler’s Syndrome
  • Dysfunction of pacemaker resulting from patient manipulation of the pulse generator (accidentally or purposely). Can result in diaphragmatic or brachial plexus pacing (e.g. arm twitching)
  • This is a specific form of displaced lead
Battery Depletion
  • Although discussed as an etiology above. This should be relatively rare with the newer lithium batteries as they are not prone to sudden power failure. Instead, they should have issues with gradual battery depletion which should cause a low battery alarm over months to years before complete depletion.

 5.  STEMI in Paced Rhythm 

Although not specifically a pacemaker malfunction, identifying STEMI in pacemakers can be difficult
Sgarbossa Criteria Utility in Pacemakers
  • Sgarbossa criteria was initially developed from the GUSTO-1 trial. Less than 0.1% of these patients had a ventricular paced rhythm.
  • The best evidence I could find was a retrospective study in 2010 that examined 57 patients (not a great sample size) with ventricular paced rhythms who were formally diagnosed with MI
    • Essentially, it did not find great utility in using the Sgarbossa criteria.
    • It did find
      • discordant STE >5 mm to be the most useful criteria (specificity 99%, sensitivity 10%)
      • No pts had concordant STE >1 mm
      • STD >1 mm in leads V1-V3 (specificity 81%, sensitivity 19%)
  • Takeaway:  Sgarbossa’s criteria may be able to point you towards MI, however, it by no means rules it out. Therefore, if you are worried for MI based on history and/or have an EKG that is dynamic or changed from previous EKGs (pacemaker patients should have several), then it is likely a good idea to involve cardiology early

Pacemaker Management In The Emergency Department

Labs and Imaging

  • Luckily, the work-up for pacemaker related symptoms is the same for any patient with palpitations, chest pain, or SOB (CBC, BMP, +/- Magnesium, CXR, troponin, EKG). However, it should also always include pacemaker interrogation as well.
  • CXR
    • requires AP and lateral views to determine correct location of pacer wires
    • Although there are algorithms to determine correct position based on these views alone, it is much easier to compare to lead placement on previous CXRs
    • Requires over penetration of CXR if want to see model of pacemaker
Applying a Magnet
  • Magnet is useful in any unstable tachycardic patients with pacemaker
  • Magnet causes closure of a “reed switch” within the pacemaker circuitry which converts the pacemaker to an asynchronous or fixed rate-rate pacing mode (VOO or DOO depending on the type of pacemaker discussed above).
    • VOO:  ventricle is paced.
    • DOO:  both the atria and ventricle are paced.
    • Once the magnet is removed, the reed switch will revert back causing the pacemaker to resume its regular programmed settings. If PMT, then should stop the tachycardia as magnet eliminates the reentry tachycardia.
  • Note that if there is a co-associated ICD, the magnet will also deactivate the ICD, as long as the magnet is in place
Performing CPR
  • No changes
Applying Pacer Pads
  • Apply pacer pads in anterior-posterior orientation, often at least 8 cm away from the device so that its circuitry is not augmented.
Post-Arrest
  • CXR should be performed post-arrest (as in all patients). Although rare, special consideration should be taken to note if the pacing leads were displaced during chest compression.
  • Immediate return of pacing (capture) may not occur after resuscitation and/or defibrillation–this is a result of global ischemia and increased pacing threshold (Exit Block), and often not an indication of pacemaker malfunction. This may require temporary transcutaneous pacing if capture or pacing cannot be resumed.

Main Takeaways

  • Know the settings of VVI and DDD as these are the most common
  • Pts often carry a pacemaker card which should list the reason the pacemaker was placed as well as the pacer settings
  • The vast majority of pacemaker complications occur within the first few weeks or months of pacemaker implantation
  • Pacemaker complications/malfunctions can fall into several categories including
    • Pacemaker Box Complications (infection, hematoma, thrombophlebitis, pacemaker syndrome)
    • Rate is Too Fast (Normal response, Atrial Arrhythmias, Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia, Sensor-Induced Tachycardia)
    • Rate is Too Slow (failure to capture, failure to pace)
    • Uncommon problems (Twiddler’s syndrome, Runaway Pacemaker, Battery Depletion)
    • STEMI in paced rhythm:  Sgarbossa can point you in the right direction; however, does not rule out. A changed or dynamic EKG in the right history is concerning.

History of Implanted Pacemakers

The first implanted pacemaker surgery was performed in Sweden in 1958. The idea of an implanted pacemaker was developed by a surgeon name Ake Senning and a physician inventor named Rune Elmqvist. The patient was a 43-year old engineer named Arne Larsson (pictured below) who suffered from complete heart block as well as Stokes-Adams attacks that required multiple resuscitations per day. His wife learned of the experimental work of Senning and Elmqvist through press reports, and pleaded with the physicians to perform this operation on her husband despite the lack of adequate testing. Senning was later quoted as saying, “In the 1950s we did not have any liability problems. The patients and relatives were happy if the patient survived.”
Arne Larson.jpg
Arne Larson

As most good stories go, the operation was a success with adequate pacing of his heart. This success was short-lived, however, as the patient had to be taken back to the OR to replace the circuitry as it quickly malfunctioned a few hours after the initial operation. This set up the patient, Arne Larsson, for a common phenomenon throughout his life as he required re-implantation of a total of 5 lead systems and 22 pulse generators during his lifetime

In 1969, the first lithium battery implantable pacemaker was produced, which led to the more modern era of pacemakers. It also meant that Arne Larson did not require as many pacemaker revisions as before.

Interestingly, the patient, Arne Larsson, out survived both scientists living to the ripe age of 86 yoa, passing in 2001 from unrelated melanoma. The scientists, Ake Senning and Rune Elmqvist, lived long lives as well passing at age 84 in 2000 and age 90 in 1996, respectively.

Bonus Pacemaker History–How did we find out that we could externally pace the heart? It’s crazy.

In 1882, a 46-year-old female, named Catharina Serafin, from Upper Silesia in Prussia developed a thoracic mass. She visited a surgeon by the name of Hugo Von Ziemssen who excised the mass as well as the left anterior chest wall, thus, exposing her heart which could be seen under a thin layer of skin. Von Ziemssen (I’m assuming out of pure curiosity) applied external electrical current to this area, and noted that he could change her heart rate at will via the electrical current. Ever the scientist, he documented his findings via 1882-based Instagram techniques (seen below). This was the first demonstration that we could externally pace the heart.
Thoracic Wall PatientPatient's Paced Rhythm.jpg
                      Catharina Serafin Along Side The First Paced Rhythm

Resources

  1. RebelEM (Link)
  2. CanadiEM (Link 1Link 2)
  3. LITFL (Link 1Link 2)
  4. Aquilina O. A brief history of cardiac pacing. Images in Paediatric Cardiology. 2006;8(2):17-81. (Link)
  5. Rosen’s (Marx, J. A., & Rosen, P. (2014). Rosen’s emergency medicine: Concepts and clinical practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders.)

5-minute Journal, EKG, Xray… in a RUSH

Part of our new conference schedule is doing a quick 5 minute summary on a journal article of interest, EKG from the past week, and Xray. The idea being that by the end of the year, we will have roughly covered 40 journals, EKGs, and Xray Topics.

5-Minute Journal

Today’s 5 minute journal was performed by the great resident, Dr. Bill McDowell, who absolutely crushed it.

Article Title
NEJM, 2017

I think this is a great article to review as we see abscesses frequently, and it somewhat becomes humdrum in the ED. Abscesses are also fraught with debate on who should receive antibiotics vs. I+D alone. The main takeaways from this article are below.

Abscess Background
— Historically, I+D by itself has an approximate 84% cure rate
— Many small previous studies showed no difference in cure rates of I+D alone vs. I+D with antibiotics
— One prior large study (Talan et al, 2016) found superior cure rates with Bactrim/I+D vs. placebo/I+D (80.5% vs. 73.6% cure rate).

Article Summary
— 
Clinical Question:  Do antibiotics with anti-MRSA activity improve cure rates for abscesses when given following I+D?
— 
Study Type:  Multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (superiority design)
—  Study Groups:  10-day courses of Clindamycin vs. Bactrim vs. Placebo (following standard I+D)
—  Inclusion Criteria:  single abscess <5cm diameter, age>6 months, 1 day of 2 or more symptoms (erythema, swelling/induration, local warmth, purulent drainage, tenderness)
—  Exclusion Criteria:  BMI>40, immunocompromised (including diabetes, chronic renal failure), immunosuppresive therapy, SIRS criteria present, Temp>38.5C, human/animal bite, site requiring specialist (genitalia, perirectal, hand), anti-staphylococcus antibiotic in past 14 days, requires admission, resident of long-term care facility, major surgery in past 12 months
— Primary Outcome Being Tested:  Clinical Cure. “Lack of Clinical cure” was defined as:  continued signs/symptoms, occurrence of skin infection at new body site, reoccurrence at original site, inability to take entire course of antibiotic secondary to adverse side effects, hospitalization related to infection, or unplanned surgical treatment of infection
Study Population:  786 patients (36% peds). 343 patients fully adherent to antibiotic 10-day course. Average surrounding area of erythema 27.4 cm²  (~5×5 cm)
— Results:
—  Cure rates:  clindamycin: 83.1%, Bactrim: 81.7%, Placebo: 68.9%
(Statistical significance for antibiotics vs. placebo). No statistical
signifance between bactrim vs. clindamycin
—  Most failures due to new lesion at other site or use of rescue
medication- especially in placebo group
—  Rates of Diarrhea:  Clindamycin 21.9%, Bactrim 11.1%, Placebo 12.5%
—  Study population had large surrounding erythema suggesting large
percentage of co-associated cellulitis

Conclusions/Takeaways
—  Antibiotics have a clinically significant higher cure rate compared to placebo. However, this study population had a relatively large surrounding area of erythema, which makes it unclear whether the antibiotics were treating the abscess itself or the co-associated cellulitis. Furthermore, it appears the advantage of antibiotic use in these patients was in preventing occurrence of an abscess at a separate site, which suggests the antibiotics main function was in clearing MRSA recidivism in this patient population vs. the actual treatment of the original skin infection.
—  Although there was no statistical difference in cure rates between Bactrim and Clindamycin, it does appear to be advantageous to prescribe Bactrim vs. Clindamycin as was associated with fewer side effects–mainly rates of diarrhea (Clinda 21.9% vs. Bactrim 11.1%)
—  Abscess treatment has evolved greatly over the last decade with several studies performed during this time. RebelEM provides a great summary of this research (RebelEM Abscesses). I also love this review because it refers to some amazing work by our own RUSH staff including Dr. Gottlieb and Dr. Hallock as well as our always consulted pharm team including Josh DeMott and Gary Peska (Annals of EM Link)

 

5-Minute EKG

The 5-minute EKG was presented by our fan-favorite attending, Dr. Patwari. See EKG below (Answer to follow)Aflutter

As always, it is important to approach an EKG in a systematic way including rate, rhythm, axis, intervals, and segments. However, the big takeaway from this EKG is that it is a Regular Narrow-Complex Tachycardia with HR roughly 150. Now we just need to decide which type of Regular Narrow-Complex Tachycardia. This should lead us to a differential including Sinus Tachycardia, SVT (AVNRT vs. AVRT), and Atrial Flutter. You could also consider Atrial Ectopic Tachycardia (more commonly seen in peds), however, it is a rarer diagnosis compared to above.

Drumroll… This is Atrial Flutter. Clues to this are the saw-tooth appearance caused by the flutter waves, HR of roughly 150, and P waves that march out at a rate of roughly 300.

Atrial Flutter Basics
— Type of supraventricular tachycardia caused by re-entry circuit within the right atrium
— Since it originates from the atria, the heart rate will resemble the atrial rate, most often ~300 bpm (though there can be variability person-to-person with average range 250-350)
— The AV node acts as the electrical gateway between the atria and ventricle, and has long refractory period allowing it to “block” excessive depolarizations from the atria
— This most often leads to a 2:1 AV ratio block meaning for every two P waves produced, a QRS will form (as seen above) which often produces a ventricular rate (QRS) of HR roughly 150.
— If there is a higher-degree block (e.g. from medications or underlying heart disease), you can see a 3:1 or 4:1 block, which corresponds to the number of P waves prior to the QRS. This also gives a much better “saw-tooth” appearance which we remember from our Med School rhythm strips  seen in FirstAid (as below)

Atrial Flutter AV BLOCKS
Examples of 2:1 Block, 3:1 Block, and 4:1 Block

— If we confused the first EKG with SVT, and gave adenosine (AV nodal blocking agent), we would see the continuation of flutter waves, but no QRS depolarizations due to the AV nodal blocking properties of adenosine (seen in EKG below). The good news is that adenosine only lasts 10-15 seconds, and ventricular contractions will continue thereafter. The same is true for vagal maneuvers which may transiently unmask the flutter waves (though more commonly will cause no changes)

Atrial Flutter with Adenosine
Atrial Flutter after AV Nodal Blocking with Adenosine From Dr. Smith’s ECG Blog

Pitfalls of Diagnosing Atrial Flutter
— The rate isn’t always exactly 150. If the rate is slower (e.g. HR 125-140, it can resemble Sinus Tachycardia. Therefore, in any regular narrow-complex tachycardia with HR 130-170, it is important to consider atrial flutter. Also Atrial flutter patients are often stable, and therefore, there is time to work up the EKG
— If the rate is faster (e.g HR 160-175), it can resemble SVT as P waves become buried in the frequent QRS complexes. Of note, SVT typically presents with HR 170-250. You can attempt vagal maneuvers to either convert to NSR or cause unmasking of flutter waves. Adenosine can also unmask the underlying flutter.

Treatment of Atrial Flutter
— Treatment options to be discussed in more detail in a following conference. But briefly, the options include cardioversion, rate-control and +/- anticoagulation. Treatment is very similar to Atrial Fibrillation. Of note, atrial flutter is very sensitive to cardioversion often only requiring 50-100 J.

 

5-Minute Xray

This week’s radiology review focused on Pelvic Ring Fractures. Again, it’s only a 5-minute review so we dedicated it to the AP view. However, in a detailed work-up, additional views (including inlet/outlet and CT) will be obtained.

Quick Review of AP Pelvic Xray

Pelvic Xray Review
Artwork Provided by Dr. Patwari

Classifying Pelvic Ring Fractures
— As is anything in Emergency Medicine, start with the basics. Is the pt hemodynamically stable or unstable? The pelvis is notorious for being able to hide blood. Also it is important to do a thorough secondary survey as these injuries are associated with high energy blunt trauma, and secondary injuries can be missed. For instance, pelvic ring fractures were associated with chest injury in 63% of cases, long bone fractures in 50% of cases, head and abdominal injury in 40% of cases, and spine fractures in 25% of cases (Orthobullets).
Is the fracture stable vs. unstable? There are two classification systems that can be used (Tile Classification vs. Young-Burgess Classification) with the end goal of determining the stability and severity of the fracture. The Young-Burgess is used more commonly (reviewed below) and divides fractures by mechanism (Lateral Compression, Anteroposterior compression, and Vertical Shear)

  1. Lateral Compression Fracture (LC)
    — Often seen in T-bone MVC or pedestrian hit from side
    — Typically, Rami Fracture with ipsilateral iliac fracture.
    — Most common Pelvic Ring Fracture.
    Lateral compression1Lateral Compression
  2. Anteroposterior Compression (APC)
    — Often from head-on-collision MVC
    — Symphysis widening. >2.5 cm is a more unstable fracture that often requires fixation surgery. May also have associated SI joint diastasis as well as disruption of SI ligaments
    — These are the patients that present with hypotension. This is due to the mechanism that causes the iliac wings to be forced outward allowing for increased pelvic volume
    Anterioposterior1Anteroposterior
  3. Vertical Shear
    — Results from vertically oriented force. Most often fall from great height (e.g. fall from building onto legs)
    Vertical Shear1Vertical Shear

 

Young Burgess Classification System
And as promised… For all the people that really want to get in the weeds, The Young Burgess Classification System. I love that vertical shear is not further divided by severity as it implies badness.

Young Burgess
Young Burgess Classification From OrthoBullets

 

Fun Medical History

I really enjoy medical history, and it’s my goal to share at least a small piece of medical history at the end of each post. I actually learned this piece of trivia from Dr. Somy Thottathil. This past week we celebrated the 47th anniversary of the first CT scan ever. It took place on October 1, 1971, in Wimbledon, London. It was performed by the scientist Sir Godfrey Hounsfield (yep, of Hounsfield unit fame)–pictured below. It was only designed for brain imaging, and in this first Head CT, revealed a brain tumor in a 41-year-old female. In another 4 years, the first whole-body CT scanner was developed.

Additional fun fact–the development of this first CT scanner is partially owed to the Beatles. Hounsfield was part of the EMI company, which was the same company that owned The Beatles’ music. The profits from their music helped to fund this research.

First CT Scan

 

Diagnosing Heart Failure… in a RUSH

We can all recall learning about the NYHA classification, and being taught to ask about our CHF ” greatest hits”:  orthopnea, dyspnea on exertion, number of pillows (my favorite question), worsening edema, etc., but how does this stack up in the literature?

Luckily, a well titled paper called “Does This Dyspneic Patient in the Emergency Department Have Congestive Heart Failure?” (Wang et. al, 2005) answered this question.

In essence, this paper demonstrated that a lot of the symptoms, listed above, that we associate with CHF actually have somewhat meager likelihood ratios for diagnosing CHF. They are still important to ask because they inform our overall clinical picture of the patient. However, it is important to delve into the strengths and limitations of some of these findings. So let’s dive in…

The Best Predictors for CHF diagnosis on H+P (based on LR>4.0)

  1. Third Heart sound, S3 (LR 11). –UWorld loves this question because it is the physical exam finding most associated with diagnosis of CHF
  2. Prior History of CHF (LR 5.8)–Without a doubt, the best answer in any diagnosis is that they already have it.
  3. Abdominojugular Reflux (LR 6.4) or JVD (LR 5.1). –easily one of the coolest findings when visible but often concealed by some extra habitus in that area
  4. Initial Clinical Judgment (LR 4.4)

This in comparison to our CHF “greatest hits” that range in LR 1.3-2.8

  1. Rales (LR 2.8)
  2. Paroxysmal Nocturnal dyspnea (LR 2.6)
  3. Lower-extremity Edema (LR 2.3)
  4. Orthopnea (LR 2.2)
  5. Dyspnea on Exertion (LR 1.3)

Now, what part of our workup is most important at making this diagnosis?

Chest Xray is Great!
– Pulmonary venous congestion (LR 12.0)
– Interstitial edema (LR 12.0)
– Alveolar Edema (6.0)
– Cardiomegaly (3.3)
– Pleural Effusions (LR 3.2)

CHF xray

High BNP increases likelihood of CHF
– BNP >250 (LR 4.6)
– BNP >200 (LR 3.7)
– BNP >150 (LR 3.1)
– BNP >100 (LR 2.7)

Low BNP decreases likelihood of CHF
– BNP<100  (LR 0.06)

BNP

Main Takeaway

In the ED, the patient with dyspnea on exertion is omnipresent, and this presenting complaint has a wide differential with CHF being one of the more common causes we encounter. From the article, we can see that history of CHF, S3, JVD, and abdominojugular reflux have the highest likelihood ratios (LR>5) for diagnosing CHF, while rales, PND, lower extremity edema, orthopnea, and DOE (LR 1.3-2.8) are associated with somewhat lower likelihood ratios. However, all of these findings taken together inform our initial clinical judgment, and this initial judgment has been shown to be a strong predictor of CHF (LR 4.4).

Furthermore, our workup of the patient can point us towards the correct diagnosis. This workup is likely to include a CBC, CMP, troponin, BNP, VBG lactate, CXR, and EKG. Chest Xray was associated with the highest likelihood ratios, while BNP had great utility in ruling in (BNP>100) and ruling out (BNP<100) a CHF diagnosis. However, when evaluating BNP, it is important to keep in the back of your mind other causes of an elevated BNP including CKD, liver disease (ascites), PE, MI, stroke, SAH, and sepsis (by no means an exhaustive list), as well as causes of a falsely lowered BNP as seen in obesity.

1:  Wang, C. (2005). Does This Dyspneic Patient in the Emergency Department Have Congestive Heart Failure?. JAMA, 294(15), p.1944.

 

 

William Harvey

Pictured above and in the featured image is Dr. William Harvey, who is credited as the first physician to describe in detail the systemic circulation. This work was called De Motu Cordis (On the Motion of the Heart and Blood). He is the one to blame for all the discoveries and mechanisms that were uncovered thereafter. He is also credited for having one of the best “Letters of Recommendation” upon graduation from med school:  “[He] conducted himself so wonderfully well in the examination and had shown such skill, memory and learning that he had far surpassed even the great hopes which his examiners had formed of him.” In addition to describing circulation, William also spent time as as an “examiner” of witchcraft cases. William was a known sceptic of witchcraft and was involved in the acquittal of several persons accused during his lifetime. You have to hand it to a guy who had time to describe the entire cardiovascular system in detail and disprove witchcraft all in one career.

Hyperglycemia

Here are some resources for hyperglycemia based on our session today. First here are RMC’s DKA protocols for adults and pediatric patients.

Then some videos (old and new) about DKA and HHS.

2013 DKA and HHS



These video review diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar states. The second one has some formulas that you should know exist.

Pediatric DKA



The management of DKA in children has some important differences, namely worrying about cerebral edema.

Of note, the PECARN network released an article in NEJM June 14, 2018 comparing fast and slow IV administration of 0.45% and 0.9% NS to determine who gets neurologic deficits. There were no differences between the groups.

1: Kuppermann N, Ghetti S, Schunk JE, Stoner MJ, Rewers A, McManemy JK, Myers SR, Nigrovic LE, Garro A, Brown KM, Quayle KS, Trainor JL, Tzimenatos L, Bennett JE, DePiero AD, Kwok MY, Perry CS 3rd, Olsen CS, Casper TC, Dean JM, Glaser NS; PECARN DKA FLUID Study Group. Clinical Trial of Fluid Infusion Rates for Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2275-2287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716816. PubMed PMID: 29897851.

Resuscitative Hysterectomy aka Peripartum C-Section

I hope I never ever have to do this, but these people at the Essentials of EM conference make it look easy. I think this is worth watching.

Some points I took away from the video:

  1. This is a resuscitative delivery. It is meant to save the mother. The fetus and uterus are diverting a lot of blood away from mom.
  2. Chest compressions are going on the entire time.
  3. The immediate next stop if you get ROSC is the OR, so call OB right away.
  4. Don’t forget to deliver the placenta and massage the uterus. Get that thing out and the uterus smaller. Both divert blood away from mom.

 

Idiot’s (Me) Guide to MRI

Whenever the Neurology team comes down and starts asking for special MRI scans with T2-this and gadolinium that, my eyes usually glaze over. So here’s a very brief guide to MRI’s. Very brief.

General Principles

The MRI works by applying a magnetic field to the body. This magnetic field aligns the protons in water nuclei. Next, external radio frequency energy is applied which displaces the protons from that alignment. When this RF energy is removed, the energy emitted is measured.

There are two different ways to apply this RF energy, each with different time constants. Each differ based on how often the pulses are applied (TR) or the time between the RF pulse and reading the emitted energy (TE).

  • T1: longitudinal, short TE and TR times, and
  • T2: transverse, longer TE and TR times.
  • T1 can be used using gadolinium (a non-toxic paramagnetic contrast agent) which changes the signal intensities in T1. This makes vascular structures very bright and is good for looking at the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (tumors, abscesses, MS, among others).
  • FLAIR is a kind of T2 that uses longer times. T2 FLAIR is good for differentiating between CSF and other abnormalities.
  • Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) detects the random movement of water protons in the space it has available to it. Normally, extra cellular water is able to move around freely. In ischemic tissue, diffusion becomes limited as the NA/K pump shuts down and water gets trapped in the smaller intracellular space.
Weighting Which tissue appears brighter
T1: T1-weighted MRI Tissue with short T1 relaxation time appears brighter (hyperintense). Grey matter is bright, CSF is dark.

This is good for looking at anatomy.

T2: T2-weighted MRI Tissue with long T2 relaxation time appears brighter (hyperintense). Edema lights up. Air will be black.
T1C: T1-weighted MRI after administration of contrast media Many tumors show signal enhancement after administration of contrast agent.

So contrast is good for looking at any structural abnormality.

FLAIR: fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI Bright signal of the CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) is suppressed which allows a better detection of small hyperintense lesions.

This is good for looking at pathology in the white matter.

DWI: Diffusion weighted imaging Bright signal in ischemic tissue, good for looking for acute stroke.

And there you have it. I’ll find some good open source pictures to include, as well.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)

At last month’s mortality and morbidity conference, we discussed a case of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES). Our consultant, a neuro-intensivist, told us that PRES is not always posterior, not always reversible nor always presenting with encephalopathy. Thanks whoever named that syndrome.

The presentation is extremely variable. Typically presenting with:

  • headache,
  • altered mental status,
  • visual changes,
  • hypertension or
  • seizures.

And as our case demonstrated many (or all) of these can be initially absent. Most resolve (though can take weeks) though some do herniate and die. In the references, there is an article that lists three cases presenting with varying severity. Given this, PRES is likely more common than we think.

Risk factors for PRES include HTN, kidney disease, autoimmune disease, malignancy, transplant, cytotoxic meds, RAS, sepsis, pre-eclampsia, Takyasu, post-partum hemorrhage, Sheehan syndrome and MODS.

It is also associated with hemorrhage (20%), most are punctate though almost 10% of the bleeds can be pretty big.

Pathophysiology

Endothelial cell dysfunction leads to edema of the surrounding tissue. The posterior cerebrum is most vulnerable due to poor sympathetic innervation of its vasculature.

The symptoms seem to progress until it becomes obvious, hence many are missed on initial presentation. Even if diagnosed earlier, I don’t know what we can do other than remove the offending agent, lower the BP, and treat any seizures.

Imaging

MRI is the way to diagnose it. This will show increased T2 and T2 FLAIR signal intensity usually posterior, but remember PRES can present anywhere.

Treatment

Treatment is to lower the BP, treat seizure and remove any causative agent. Do not use NTG to lower BP as it can increase cerebral edema worsening things.

References

  1. Image taken from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterior_reversible_encephalopathy_syndrome
  2. http://casemed.case.edu/clerkships/neurology/Web%20Neurorad/MRI%20Basics.htm
  3. Thompson, R. J., Sharp, B., Pothof, J., & Hamedani, A. (2015). Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in the emergency department: case series and literature review. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16(1), 5–10. http://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.12.24126

Bougie’s Galore

Here are some great videos on how to use bougies.

Intubation with bougies

Scott Weingart… yes, yes, but his video is good.

Shows a preloaded bougie, which is what we should probably be doing.

Has some great trouble shooting techniques

Bougie cric

Darren Braude’s video.

A different view of the whole thing.

I like this one because it shows the technique we’ll more likely be using.

Crazy bougie cric in real life

Ruben Strayer of EMUpdates posted a great video on how to do a cricothyrotomy. The only things that I would change are

  1. I would likely be soiling myself a lot more out of sheer panic
  2. I’d have everything ready (syringe and bougie)
  3. I’d pass the bougie in before removing the scalpel, just paranoid of losing that entrance
  4. I would have just cut the dude’s jaw wires instead of his neck

Great video of a procedure we do not do often. The more we see it, the less freaked out we’ll be by it.

He actually has another video of the same. How many cameras does this guy have in the resusc bay?

Stroke or Vestibular Neuritis? Use the HINTS

The other day, Tom and I had a patient with the symptom of continuous vertigo. This is to be distinguished from someone with episodic triggered vertigo, such as when turning their head to the right, which we associate with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). The differential for continuous vertigo includes vestibular neuritis (a relatively benign diagnosis, the “Bells Palsy of Cranial Nerve 8”) and posterior circulation stroke (a potentially lethal disease if missed).

And as deus ex machina, Johnathan Edlow published an article on just this subject.

He believes the old teaching is failing us. We were taught to first ask “dizziness means different things to different people” to distinguish lightheadedness from ataxia from vertigo. If it was was to differentiate central from peripheral by using a constellation of symptoms: sudden or insidious onset, vomiting or not, severity of vertigo. The problem is, patients cannot make the distinction between vertigo and lightheadedness reliably and those distinguishing symptoms are all very insensitive.

So Edlow presents a different approach: timing and triggers.

  • Acute Vertiginous Syndrome (AVS): vertiginous symptoms that lasts days, is continuous and may be accompanied by nausea, vomiting and change with motion. This is not BPPV.
    • Benign: vestibular neuritis, labyrinthitis
    • Serious: posterior circulation stroke, multiple sclerosis, cerebellum hemorrhage
  • Triggered Episodic Vestibular Syndromes (t-EVS): lasts a short time, exacerbated by a specific trigger, such as moving the head or standing up.
    • Benign: BPPV
    • Serious: hypovolemia (hemorrhage, sepsis), central paroxysmal positional vertigo (CPPV)
  • Spontaneous Episodic Vestibular Syndromes (s-EVS): episodes last minutes to hours without a particular trigger
    • Benign: vestibular migraines, Ménière’s disease
    • Serious: TIA
  • Chronic Vestibular Syndromes (CVS): vertigo that lasts weeks to months
    • Benign: medication side effects, anxiety
    • Serious: posterior fossa mass

Our patient suffered from AVS. The HINTS exam has been shown to be even more sensitive the MRI in distinguishing between vestibular neuritis and a posterior circulation stroke.

The Anatomy

Pictured here is an actual photograph from a meticulous dissection. The thing that matters is that the cochlea (responsible for hearing) and vestibular apparatus (responsible for balance) are supplied by the vestibular and cochlear nerve, which come from the vestibulo-cochlear nerve. Both are supplied by the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, part of the posterior circulation. Occlusion of this artery can lead to balance and hearing changes as well as edematous cerebellar strokes that herniate. Hence it’s important to be able to distinguish the cause of acute vertiginous symptoms.

Inflammation of the vestibular nerve leads to vestibular neuritis. Inflammation of the vestibulo-cochlear nerve leads to labyrinthitis.

The Five Questions You Need to Ask in AVS

There are five questions you need to ask in order to distinguish between this central and peripheral cause.

  1. Is there central nystagmus?
  2. Is there skew deviation?
  3. Is the head impulse test negative in a patient with nystagmus?
  4. Are there any CNS signs on exam?
  5. Any gait or truncal ataxia?

If you answer yes to any of these questions, evaluate for a central cause. If all are no, it’s likely vestibular neuritis. These questions will take us through the HINTS exam, but we don’t perform the exam in the order of the letters H-I-N-T-S, instead it’s N – TS – HI. But that doesn’t spell anything.

1. Is there central nystagmus?

First we should talk about nystagmus, the “n” in HINTS. These are the quick saccade movements that occur in patients with vestibular issues. There is a fast followed by slow movement and the nystagmus is named for the direction of the fast component. No nystagmus is considered normal.

Now have the patient look to the left and right. It may be necessary to hold a piece of paper to the side so the patient isn’t looking at anything in particular (which can extinguish nystagmus).

  • Here you can see that when the patient is looking to the left (top drawing), there is a fast component to the right followed by slow to the left.
  • When the patient looks to the right (bottom drawing), there is a fast component to the right followed by slow to the left.

This is unidirectional nystagmus. Contrast this with bi-directional nystagmus.

  • Here you can see that when the patient looks to the left, there’s a fast to the right followed by slow to the left.
  • When the patient looks to the right, there’s a fast to the left followed by a slow to the right.

The fast and slow components change direction when the patient looks in different directions.

Type of nystagmus What’s it mean?
No nystagmus normal state… though you can sometimes see this with a cerebellar stroke. Great.
Spontaneous horizontal nystagmus not diagnostic
Gaze evoked horizontal nystagmus not diagnostic, though probably BPPV
Direction changing horizontal nystagmus Central cause
Vertical nystagmus Central cause
Torsional nystagmus Central cause

Nystagmus if the first thing to look for.

2. Is there skew deviation?

The next question to ask is if the eyes deviate upward and downward when you cover and uncover it. You are looking for small deviations so look first at one eye, cover and uncover both. Then look at the other eye, cover and uncover both.

Tell the patient to focus on your nose.

  1. Cover one of the patient’s eyes
  2. Uncover it and look for an upward deviation. It may be as small as 1 mm.
  3. Cover the other eye. The patient is still looking ahead.
  4. Uncover that eye and that eye may deviate downward 1 mm.

3. Is there head impulse in a patient with nystagmus?

Tell the patient to relax their head and focus on your nose. Then gently rotate the head left and right about 10-15° then quickly bring them back to center.

Normal is no saccade. This is what you would expect in a patient without nystagmus, so if the patient demonstrates no nystagmus in the first step, you do not progress further and get to this step.

If there is a saccade in a patient with vertigo, this represents a peripheral lesion.

Lack of vertigo in a patient with vertigo represents a central problem. So a “normal finding in a patient without vertigo” is the same as an “abnormal finding in a patient with vertigo.”

4. Are there any CNS signs on exam?

Ask if any of these are present.

  • Abnormal neurologic exam → central cause
  • Abnormal hearing exam → central or peripheral
  • Anioscoria → central cause
  • Ptosis → lateral medullary infarct
  • Hoarseness → lateral medullary infarct
  • Loss of facial pain and temperature sensation → lateral medullary infarct
  • Abnormal finger-to-nose or heel-to-shin → cerebellar problem

5. Any gait or truncal ataxia?

  • Cannot sit up without holding the railings → truncal ataxia → cerebellar or brainstem problem
  • Cannot walk without ataxia → gait ataxia → cerebellar or brainstem problem

So what do you do if you suspect a central cause?

Do not order a CT scan. It gives you false reassurance and you’re more likely to send home a posterior stroke than if you hadn’t gotten the CT in the first place.

An MRI with diffusion weighted imaging (which is normally good for strokes) can miss strokes as well. The HINTS exam is said to be better than MRI in the first 48 hours.

Studies have not been done proving that ER docs can do this exam reliably, but it’s not outside of our skill set.

Documentation

So here’s how I may document my exam for patients with an acute vertiginous syndrome.

1. Is there central vertigo?
	*** No Nystagmus → not vestibular neuritis
	*** Spontaneous horizontal nystagums → non-diagnostic
	*** Gaze Evoked horizontal nystagmus → non-diagnostic
	*** Direction Changing nystagmus → possible central cause
2. Skew deviation 
	*** exists suggesting a central cause
	*** does not exist, potentially not a central cause
3. Head impulse test shows
	*** no saccade in a patient without vertigo
	*** saccade in patient with vertigo, possible peripheral cause
	*** no saccade in a patient with vertigo, possible central problem
4. Neurologic testing shows:
	*** normal neuro exam
	*** normal hearing exam
	*** no aniosocoria
	*** no ptosis
	*** no hoarse voice
	*** no facial numbness or temp insensitivity
	*** finger-to-nose and heel-to-shin are normal
5. *** No gait or truncal ataxia